The barriers and facilitators section of a nursing capstone shows you have thought realistically about what could stop your intervention working, and how you will respond.
The most common mistake is listing barriers with no mitigation. Rubrics expect both the problem and the plan, plus the facilitators you will build on. This guide shows how to write each part, with examples from a fall prevention project.
How to Present Barriers and Facilitators
Name three to five specific barriers likely in your setting, and pair each with a concrete mitigation strategy. Add the facilitators that make success more likely and say how you will use them.
Support the barriers with evidence from implementation literature, and link the analysis to your framework, for example as restraining forces in Lewin's force field analysis. A SWOT table is a useful way to organize it if your program asks for one.
Barriers and Facilitators as a Pair
Barriers slow adoption, raise the risk of failure or stop the intervention reaching its target group. Facilitators speed adoption, reduce friction and make success more likely.
Present both, because facilitators shape your strategy as much as barriers do. A unit with a strong safety culture and an engaged manager needs a different plan from one without them.
Implementation Barriers and Adoption Barriers
Implementation barriers stop the change launching or running correctly: approval delays, resource gaps, training logistics. They are often one-off and can be planned around.
Adoption barriers stop staff following the change consistently once it starts: knowledge gaps, workflow friction, attitudes and EHR usability. They need ongoing monitoring, which links them to your sustainability plan.
SWOT Analysis in a Nursing Capstone
Some programs ask for a SWOT analysis. It maps internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats. Here is an example for a fall risk assessment project on a medical-surgical unit.
| Strengths (internal facilitators) | Weaknesses (internal barriers) |
|---|---|
| Strong unit safety culture | Heavy assignments limiting assessment time |
| Supportive nurse manager | High turnover eroding protocol knowledge |
| EHR already holds the admission assessment | Limited IT time for flowsheet changes |
| Staff with recent EBP training | Fatigue from earlier quality initiatives |
| Opportunities (external facilitators) | Threats (external barriers) |
|---|---|
| Falls are a tracked quality and accreditation priority | Competing initiatives for staff attention |
| Benchmarking data available for fall rates | Budget freeze on printed materials |
| New graduates arriving with EBP training | High census during implementation |
| Hospital-wide patient safety campaign | Provider resistance to nurse-initiated protocols |
A SWOT is a starting map, not the analysis itself. Each weakness and threat still needs a mitigation, written in the barriers section.
Common Barriers and How to Mitigate Them
| Barrier | What it looks like | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Resistance to change | "We have always done it this way"; doubts about a student-led project | Share unit data at a huddle, recruit respected nurses as early adopters, invite input on the protocol before finalizing it |
| Time pressure | The new assessment feels like extra work on a full assignment | Build it into the existing admission assessment, pilot in a moderate-census period, teach in existing huddles |
| Knowledge gaps | Staff unfamiliar with the tool or its scoring | Short case-based session, pocket reference card, a self-paced module for those who miss it |
| Documentation burden | A separate form leads to skipped entries or paper workarounds | Work with informatics to embed the tool in the current flowsheet and link the score to the risk alert |
| Approval delays | Policy committees meet rarely; QI or IRB determination takes weeks | Start approvals at project launch, send a one-page summary to leadership, run approvals alongside planning |
| Limited resources | No budget for materials or protected education time | Use existing meetings and in-house materials; confirm any tool licensing early |
| Staff turnover | Trained staff leave, new staff arrive untrained | Add the protocol to orientation competencies, name charge nurses as ongoing coaches |
| Competing priorities | Several initiatives running at once | Frame the change as part of the unit's existing safety goals, not a new project |
Writing a Section That Earns Full Marks
A strong barriers and facilitators section does four things. Use them as a checklist when you revise.
- Names specific barriers. "Staff resistance" is a category. "Day-shift RNs who completed earlier fall training and believe current practice is enough" is a barrier that suggests a specific response.
- Pairs each barrier with a mitigation. Present barrier, why it matters, then the specific strategy.
- Cites evidence. Implementation literature describes common barriers; cite sources showing yours are real in similar settings, and evidence for your strategies where it exists.
- Links to your framework. In Lewin's model, barriers are restraining forces. In the Iowa Model, they shape the pilot decision. Say so explicitly.
Weak: "Barriers include staff resistance and lack of time. These will be addressed through education."
Strong: "Night-shift nurses may see the new assessment as extra work during admissions, a barrier reported in several implementation studies (illustrative citation). To reduce this, the assessment will be embedded in the existing admission flowsheet, so it replaces a free-text note rather than adding a form. This weakens a key restraining force identified in the force field analysis."
Why it works: the barrier is specific, evidenced, paired with a concrete strategy and tied to the framework.
Frameworks That Help You Find Barriers
If you are unsure where to look, an implementation framework gives you categories to check. Two are especially useful in nursing capstones.
- Lewin's force field analysis: lists driving and restraining forces and their strength, which turns directly into facilitators and barriers.
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): prompts you to consider the intervention itself, the outer setting, the inner setting, the individuals involved and the implementation process.
For the force field method in detail, see our guide to Lewin's change theory.
Prioritizing Your Barriers
You will usually find more barriers than you can address well. Rate each one for how likely it is and how much damage it would do, then write up the three to five that score highest.
| Low impact | High impact | |
|---|---|---|
| High likelihood | Plan a simple fix and monitor | Top priority: full mitigation in the plan |
| Low likelihood | Mention briefly or leave out | Contingency plan if it appears |
Fall risk project, rated:
Documentation burden: high likelihood, high impact. Full mitigation: embed the tool in the existing flowsheet.
Staff turnover: high likelihood, moderate impact. Add to orientation and name charge nurse coaches.
Budget freeze: low likelihood of affecting a low-cost project, low impact. One sentence noting in-house materials.
Explaining why you chose these barriers shows judgment, which committees reward more than a long list.
Making Facilitators Work for You
Facilitators are not just good news to list. Each one should appear in your plan as something you use.
| Facilitator | How to use it |
|---|---|
| Supportive nurse manager | Ask the manager to open the education session and include the change in staff expectations |
| Respected informal leaders | Recruit them as champions who model the change on each shift |
| Existing huddles | Use them for education and to share early results |
| Organizational safety priorities | Link your project to them when seeking approval |
Common Mistakes in This Section
- Listing barriers with no mitigation
- Generic barriers that could apply to any project
- Eight bullet points and one sentence about "engaging stakeholders"
- Ignoring facilitators, or listing them without using them
- No link to the framework used elsewhere in the paper
- Missing the connection between adoption barriers and the sustainability plan
How NurseCapstone Helps with Barriers and Facilitators
Send your intervention, setting, framework and rubric, plus anything you know about the unit. A writer matched to your level builds a model section with specific barriers, paired mitigation strategies, facilitators put to use and explicit framework links, or a full implementation plan around it.
Use it to guide your own analysis. Free revisions within the scope of your original request are included.
Want a Model Implementation Plan?
Send your intervention, setting and rubric. You get a model plan with paired barriers, facilitators and framework links.
Start My Implementation PlanFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
Three to five well-developed barriers suit most BSN and MSN plans. Each needs a specific mitigation strategy.
Both. Implementation barriers affect launch, while adoption barriers affect whether staff keep following the change, and they need different strategies.
A weakness is an internal barrier. SWOT also separates external threats, such as budget freezes or competing initiatives.
Yes, ideally. Citing implementation studies shows your barriers are realistic in similar settings.
They are the restraining forces in the force field analysis. Your mitigations aim to weaken them.
Usually within the implementation plan or methods chapter. Follow your program's template.
Adoption barriers such as turnover and workflow friction can return after the pilot. Your sustainability plan should name how each one will be monitored and handled.
Report it honestly in your results or discussion, explain how you responded, and what you would plan for next time. Committees value that reflection.
Many templates pair them with barriers. Either way, show how each facilitator is used in your plan.